A cat are an income getting, therefore *matters* whether or not it will get looked after – so you mention you to definitely. Just as your discuss common posessions, debts, or any other responsibilities. (Whenever escaping an abusive matchmaking, you may not have the opportunity. Here, you to definitely excuse will not number.) In the event the LW went rather than speaking that it more, they decrease golf ball towards the a duty, and you may T met with the directly to select someone else (however, unless the guy caused it to be obvious earlier which he didn’t come with demand for this new cat, I would personally nevertheless worry if someone else went out of ‘this might be the cat’ to help you ‘I do not require her pet inside my house’. Pretending in order to such as for example things (or somebody) after you cannot is actually unethical; and you can I’d be much happier on the ‘I do not love cats, however, I will manage they if you need want’ than simply regarding the ‘sure, why don’t we have a cat together’ morphing to your ‘I never ever desired an effective cat’ if the matchmaking goes bad. (Okay, however feeling bad regarding the my personal dangerous ex lover pretending so you can including my pet so long as it ideal them.)

So just why is it ok towards LW feeling weighed down by obligation of your pet yet not okay for T feeling an identical? You be seemingly providing T gave the new pet away only so you’re able to harm the latest LW, and perhaps that is correct. Or maybe T thought thus weighed down by having their expereince of living blow-up within his face when you look at the a painful and you may awkward means that he decided that he was not in a position to look after a beneficial pets now and found a great family because of it.Read More »It’s the ‘experienced he’d manage it’ that is the situation